Western Center for Agricultural Health and Safety 
  Home    The Center    Research    Publications    Community Outreach    Events    Ag Facts    Contact Us

Publications

Journal Articles

AgHealth News
  2008 Summer
  2008 Spring
  2008 Winter
  2007 Fall
  2007 Summer
  2007 Spring
  2007 Winter
  2006 Fall
  2006 Summer
  2006 Spring
  2006 Winter
  2005 Fall
  2005 Summer
  2005 Spring
  2005 Winter
  2004 Fall
  2004 Summer
  2004 Spring
  2004 Winter
  2003 Fall
  2003 Summer
  2003 Spring
  2003 Winter
  2002 Fall
  2002 Summer
  2002 Spring
  2002 Winter
  2001 Fall
  2001 Summer
  2001 Spring
  2001 Winter
  2000 Summer
  2000 Spring
  2000 Winter
  1999 Fall
  1999 Summer
  1999 Spring
  1999 Winter
  1998 Fall
  1998 Summer
  1998 Spring
  1998 Winter
  1997 Fall
  1997 Summer
  1997 Spring
  1997 Winter
  1996 Fall
  1996 Summer
  1996 Spring
  1996 Winter
  1995 Fall
  1995 Summer
  1995 Spring
  1995 Winter
  1994 Fall
  1994 Summer

UC Agricultural Health & Safety Center at Davis

On-Line News

Issue Number 1997-02
Spring 1997

Published by the UC Agricultural Health & Safety Center at Davis, University of California, Davis, Marc Schenker, M.D., M.P.H., Director, Jeff March, Editor


1997-02-01 TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
1997-02-01 Table of Contents
1997-02-02 Welcome and Introduction
1997-02-03 Crop Protection Industry Supports Ag Health & Safety
1997-02-04 Center Launches New Kid Safety Program
1997-02-05 ¡Maneje Seguro! Team Receives National Award
1997-02-06 Marcia Woodby's Work to Prevent OP Exposure in Migrant Kidsr
1997-02-07 Dermatitis Study: A Finnish Farming Comparison
1997-02-08 Cost Effectiveness of Intervention Programs


1996-02-02 WELCOME AND INTRODUCTION
Welcome to the UC Agricultural Health & Safety Center at Davis On-Line News.

On-Line News is a synopsis of news items covered by the Center's quarterly newsletter. The Center has two electronic list servers that allow automatic forwarding of e-mail to a list of subscribers. One server is a forum for announcements and discussion of agricultural health and safety issues and the other is a vehicle for the automatic distribution of the Center's quarterly newsletter.

The e-mail addresses for the forum is: aghealth@epm.ucdavis.edu (message forwarding address) and aghealth-request@epm.ucdavis.edu (subscriber request address). The addresses for the newsletter are: aghealthnews@oem.ucdavis.edu (message forwarding address) and aghealthnews-request@oem.ucdavis.edu (subscriber request address).

To subscribe to a list, send an e-mail message to the request address with no subject and a one line message giving the option subscribe and your name. For example, to subscribe to the forum for announcements and general agricultural health and safety issues, you would send the following: To: aghealth-request@epm.ucdavis.edu Subject: Message: subscribe (your name here)

By return e-mail you will receive confirmation of your request and more information about using the list server request functions.

To subscribe to the On-line News, your request would look like: To: aghealthnews-request@oem.ucdavis.edu Subject: Message: subscribe (your name here)


1997-02-03 CROP PROTECTION INDUSTRY SUPPORTS AG HEALTH & SAFETY
by Henry G. Buckwalter
A program developed by Uniroyal Chemical Company, Inc., one of the nation's preeminent agricultural chemical companies, has helped to reduce the number of Propargite-related illnesses across the country. The traditional labels on chemical products indicating "Danger," "Warning" and "Caution" do not provide adequate information to many agricultural workers. As a result, California Department of Pesticide Regulation's (DPR) Worker Health and Safety Branch created a new warning category termed "minimal expo-sure pesticides." This category is intended to distinguish a particular group of pesticides. Initially, four chem-istries were placed in this group, including bromoxynil, folpet, oxydemeton-methyl and propargite, and more are expected.

It was at this juncture that Uniroyal created its Work Safe! program in 1989 to educate field-workers, mixers, loaders and applicators on the safe use of its propargite products-Omite-30W, Omite-CR, and Comite-and to provide guidelines for safe use of these products. The specific components of the Work Safe! program include:

  • Work Safe! notebook,
  • Worker safety video in Spanish and English,
  • Safety/hygiene posters,
  • Safety guide for fieldworkers,
  • Laminated personal hygiene pocket cards,
  • Re-entry signs.
  • To date, more than 3,000 Work Safe! reference books and videotapes have been distributed to growers across the country. Based on preliminary data collected from the field since 1989, a 90 percent reduction in the number of propargite-related illnesses has been reported. The benefits of worker-safety programs sponsored by the agricultural crop protection industry are two-fold: the industry can help improve the health and welfare of people who use crop protection chemicals, while diminishing misconceptions about the safety and utility of such chemicals. Pesticide illnesses improperly diagnosed and/or reported have and will continue to result in increased pesticide regulation and reduced product availability.

    Given the high level of controversy associated with the use of crop protection chemicals, I believe it is in the best interest of the industry to keep growers informed and provide them with the necessary tools to properly train their employees. To that end, I recommend that:

  • The crop protection industry support farmers by providing them with the necessary tools to educate themselves and "certify" their employees on the safe, proper and beneficial use of crop protection chemistries;
  • The industry continue its diligent efforts toward farmworker safety and form a working committee composed of representatives of the crop protection industry, USDA, EPA and a third-party, university-level, independent research group. The committee's primary responsibility will be development of a single, basic pesticide handler's training guide for use throughout the United States;
  • The training and education of professionals responsible for the treatment of pesticide-related medical cases, such as rural medical personnel, emergency response and poison-control teams become a high priority for the crop protection industry.
  • Education programs sponsored by the crop protection industry be developed for University Extension personnel, pest control applicators, farm bureau representatives and others to encourage and promote participation in worker safety programs.
  • Uniroyal's commitment to worker health and safety continues through sponsorship of a study with Dr. Robert Krieger of UC Riverside. This study evaluates the utility of a "coverall" garment for personal protection equipment (PPE) for agricultural workers. The breathable material, made by Kimberly-Clark, is called Kleenguard Extra Protection™. Preliminary results are encouraging, affording the agricultural worker 95 percent or better protection against chemical residues in the field. The garments will be relatively inexpensive and disposable. In cooperation with DPR, Uniroyal is working on a pilot program using the Kimberly-Clark PPE.

    Uniroyal Chemical's Work Safe! program has demonstrated that education and training generates positive results for worker safety protection. But much more must be done to assure that our country's farmworkers get the information they need to protect their health. Prevention is the best medicine.

    Henry G. Buckwalter is a registration specialist-Western U.S.-for Uniroyal Chemical Co., has worked in research and development in the crop protection industry for more than 22 years, and is chair of the Internal Advisory Panel for the UC Agricultural Health & Safety Center at Davis.


    1997-02-04 CENTER LAUNCHES NEW KID SAFETY PROGRAM
    by Jennifer Weber and Kathy Garvey
    An estimated 300 deaths and 23,500 injuries occur among youth under age 20 on U.S. farms and ranches every year. To help reduce those staggering numbers the Center and Farm Safety 4 Just Kids are launching an educational program aimed at preventing injuries, fatalities and health risks to California farm children. Center investigators recently hosted a two-day Northern California agricultural tour for Shari Burgess, director of program services for Farm Safety 4 Just Kids, a non-profit organization based in Earlham, Iowa. Her visit included tours of the Oakland Farmers' Market, a 2,000-acre row crop farm in Esparto and a migrant housing project in Madison.

    Center investigators also arranged a meeting with Winters High School migrant education staff, and a radio interview with Robert Singleton, DANR broadcast information representative. Burgess then met with Center Director Marc Schenker to discuss the Center's role in establishing and coordinating a Northern California Farm Safety 4 Just Kids program.

    The tour was coordinated by Patrick O'Connor-Marer, director of the Integrated Pest Management Project's Pesticide Education Program (PEP); Jennifer Weber, PEP program representative; Martha Stiles, staff research associate in the Department of Human and Community Development; with assistance from Dona Mast, past president of the Yolo County Farm Bureau.

    Farm Safety 4 Just Kids, founded in 1987 by Iowan Marilyn Adams after her 11-year-old son, Keith, suffocated in a gravity flow wagon, now has more than 2,000 members in 44 chapters throughout the United States and Canada. Seeking to prevent farm-related childhood injuries, health risks and fatalities, the organization conducts educational programs annually and charters and develops chapters.

    "After visiting the Oakland Farmers' Market, I realized the vast size and diversity of California's agricultural population," Burgess said. "The Peruvian potato, the blood orange and herb grass at the market showcased the diversity of agricultural products grown here."

    Dona Mast showed Burgess her family farm and discussed safety issues. "Irrigation ditches on row crop farms can be especially dangerous for children," explained Mast. Burgess, along with O'Connor-Marer, Weber and Kathy Garvey, PEP writer, met with Yolo County migrant education staff members Suny DeLeon and Lupe Ortiz at Winters High School to discuss child farm safety. Ortiz explained that children who live on ranches or farms where their parents work are most likely to participate in the labor, consider the ranch or farm as their playground, and use the irrigation canals as their swimming pools. DeLeon emphasized that all resource materials that are produced must be culturally competent and appropriate to meet the needs of California's farmworking community.

    On the last day of her visit, Burgess discussed child safety with community leaders at the Yolo County Farm Bureau office in Woodland. She explained how to start a local chapter of Farm Safety 4 Just Kids, and listed resources available for farm families, as well as funding possibilities to support a statewide child safety program.


    1997-02-05 ¡MANEJE SEGURO! TEAM RECEIVES NATIONAL AWARD
    The ¡Maneje Seguro! driver safety program developed by Center investigators was selected from among hundreds of nominees across the country to receive the Nationwide Insurance On Your Side Highway Safety Award.

    The ¡Maneje Seguro! team was recognized in a special ceremony for its "exemplary and innovative efforts" in bilingual driver safety for Latino farmworkers. A plaque and a small stipend were awarded in January by Nationwide Insurance representatives. The award was established in 1994 to recognize creative approaches to saving lives and reducing injuries on our nation's roads.

    "This is the only bilingual project ever to receive this national award," said Martha Stiles, Center investigator and staff research associate in the UC Davis Department of Human and Community Development. "Our objective was to design effective ways to reach this population and to bridge gaps created by language and culture. We are extremely proud to be honored for our work."


    1997-02-06 MARCIA WOODBY'S WORK TO PREVENT OP EXPOSURE IN MIGRANT KIDS
    Marcia Woodby wasn't certain about her life goals until she spent three months as a health educator in Nicaragua in 1990. After observing conditions there she decided that she wanted to make a contribution in public health epidemiology. Currently a graduate student at UC Davis, Marcia is pursuing her Ph.D. in epidemiology.

    After growing up in St. Paul, Minn., Marcia attended the University of Colorado for two years, then completed a bachelor's degree in psychology at the University of Minnesota. While working on her graduate degree in psychology, Marcia became increasingly aware of social problems for which the field of psychology had no solutions. She decided to put her graduate studies on hold and traveled around the world working as a photographer and an English teacher.

    Marcia's work with the Center began during the summer of 1996 in Yolo and surrounding counties, where she began studying the neurotoxic effects of organophosphate pesticide (OP) exposure on 3- to 5-year-old children of migrant farmworkers. Using a cross-sectional design to assess the prevalence of childhood exposure to OPs and neurophysical and neuropsychological abnorm-alities, her study enrolled 219 farmworker and non-farmworker families. Marcia and co-investigators Ellen Gold, Alan Buckpitt, Sid Gospe and Dan Mungas collected urine samples, conducted neurological exams and gave the children a battery of neuropsychological tests. Marcia interviewed parents of the children using a questionnaire specifically designed to assess factors such as family lifestyle, education, work history and health status.

    Marcia and investigators speculate that children whose mothers are engaged in agricultural fieldwork are at highest risk of OP exposure and associated health problems since mothers have the most physical contact with young children. Marcia plans to interview more families this summer.

    "To me this study is important because little is known about the health of the children of farmworkers," said Marcia. "Like adults, children face exposure to OPs because they live close to the agricultural fields and have contact with field residues brought home on parents' clothing."

    Marcia explains that one of the negative effects of OP exposure can be neurotoxicity, which has been documented in adult farmworkers. No such studies have been conducted involving children, who may be more vulnerable than adults to the adverse effects of OP exposure due to the immaturity of their developing nervous systems.

    "Current policy regulates pesticide exposure only in adults, so more information about OP exposure and its effects is required to address children's needs," she said. Marcia's goal is to complete her Ph.D. and work in a setting that allows her to focus on the health of underserved populations. Her daughter, Ana, has followed a similar path in helping society. She is currently a senior in college and works in San Francisco with young girls who are at risk of developing a variety of social problems.


    1997-02-07 DERMATITIS STUDY: A FINNISH FARMING COMPARISON
    by Päivikki Susitaival, M.D., Ph.D.
    Statistics and studies have suggested that occupational skin diseases and allergies are more prevalent among dairy farmers in Finland than in California. While the differences may be influenced by occupational patterns or climate, comparisons are inconclusive because of inadequacy and differences in data. Farming in Finland is very different from California farming, in commodities, size of farms and climate. Most farms in Finland are small, family-owned dairies or row crop farms. The women traditionally take care of the cattle and milking, while the men work in the fields and forestry. By law, Finnish farmers are provided not only occupational health services but also municipal farmworker help when on sick leave or vacations. All farmers have been insured by Farmers' Social Insurance and compensated for occupational illnesses and injuries since 1982.

    In Finland 1,200-1,300 work-related injuries and diseases in about 100,000 active farmers are reported annually-the most common related to respiratory allergies (40 percent), musculoskeletal con-ditions (30 percent), and skin diseases (20 percent). Nearly one-third of reported occupational diseases have been associated with allergies to cow dander (annually about 100 cases of occupational asthma, 120 cases of occupational rhinitis and 80 cases of occupational dermatitis). Most of thefarmers with occupational allergies continue working with personal protective devices such as powered respirators and protective gloves, compensated by Farmers' Social Insurance.

    Studies of occupational health and hazards of farming in Finland during the past 18 years indicate that women in dairy farming are twice as likely as men to have hand dermatitis, respiratory diseases and joint problems. About 20 percent of these women tend to have hand dermatitis yearly, and about one-third of the cases are associated with allergy to cow dander. Other common causes include the use of disinfectants and detergents, wet and dirty work and allergy to rubber and to fodder flours. A statewide survey of the health of California farm operators conducted by UC Davis investigators in 1993 included the following questions on skin diseases:

  • 1) Have you experienced "any dermatitis, eczema or any other red, inflamed skin rash" during the past 12 months?
  • 2) Was a health care provider consulted?

    A total of 15 percent of women and 8.9 percent men reported having a rash corresponding to the trend in hand dermatitis rates in Finnish farming. Because of the small number of women (10 percent), the associations between reporting dermatitis and occupational factors could not be characterized separately for women. In men the rate increased with age but in women an opposite trend emerged. This latter result parallels with many studies finding hand dermatitis more common in younger versus older women. The proportion of those who had consulted a health care provider (75 percent) corresponds to the numbers of those consulting a doctor in the Finnish farmer studies.

    In the California farm operator survey, farmers were asked to report any diagnosis of cancer and specify the cancer type. Five percent of both women and men (97 out of 1,947) reported some type of skin cancer, of which four were melanomas. About 40 percent of those reporting skin cancer reported using sunscreens more than half of the time, but one-fourth of those with skin cancer never used sunscreens. Reporting of skin cancer was highly correlated with age, ranging from 1 percent in those under 40 years of age to 8 percent in those over 60. When analysis was adjusted by age and correlated by farm type, crop farming exhibited the lowest rate. That may be explained in part by the tendency of field crop farmers to use tractors with cabins, thereby lessening their exposure to the sun.

    There seems to be fewer allergy problems in California dairy farming compared to Finland. The reasons for that could be that 1) California farmworkers often don't make a lifelong career of dairy farming as do Finnish dairy farmers. 2) The animals are outside, and the work is done outside or in open barns, diminishing the amount of allergen exposures. 3) The workers are often dark-skinned and have a lot of exposure to sun, which diminishes skin allergies.

    I would like to see more emphasis placed on population-based epidemiological studies of occu-pational skin diseases. I would also welcome any information on farm-related skin problems in other areas of the United States.

    Päivikki Susitaival, M.D., Ph.D., of Kuopio, Finland, is a visiting professor at the Center specializing in epidemiology of occupational skin diseases. Her e-mail address is psus@elrond.ucdavis.edu


    1997-02-08 COST EFFECTIVENESS OF INTERVENTION PROGRAMS
    These days the public is focusing a critical eye on government spending and allocations of money for various types of research. As a result, the Clinton Administration passed a bill called the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993, which demands justification and cost-effectiveness of programs prior to federal funding.

    Patrick O'Connor-Marer, Ph.D., pesticide training coordinator for IPM Education and Publications, and outreach coordinator for the Center, is involved with two programs chosen for evaluation by the federal government-the USDA Pesticide Applicator Training Program and the IPM Initiative. In his talk "Evaluating the Cost-Effectiveness of Intervention Programs" during the Center's noon seminar in February, O'Connor-Marer described the procedures prospective grantees will face as a result of the bill, which will be fully implemented in the year 2000.

    The Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 states the following:
    1) "Congress finds that waste and inefficiency in federal programs undermines the confidence of the American people in the government and reduces the federal government's ability to address adequately vital public needs."
    2) "Federal managers are seriously disadvantaged in their efforts to improve program efficiency and effectiveness because of insufficient articulation of program goals and adequate information on program performance."
    3) "Congressional policymaking, spending decisions and program oversight is seriously handicapped by insufficient attention to program performance and results."

    "Under the new bill, researchers who can demonstrate that their programs result in the most lives saved or improved health outcome per dollar will most likely have a competitive edge when competing for funds," said O'Connor-Marer.

    At the request of NIOSH, O'Connor-Marer and other regional ag center representatives attended a "Measuring Cost Effectiveness" training program conducted by the Centers for Disease control in Atlanta. O'Connor-Marer's group participated in several exercises, including an evaluation of a three-day farm safety camp for 50 children of Georgia farmers. The program is underwritten yearly by the state of Georgia through its health department.

    The group was assigned the task of determining the true cost of putting on such an event without donations and considering participants' travel time and loss in productivity of their family farms. After detailed analyses, the group estimated the total cost of the camp to be $52,000, which equates to $1,042 per child plus the costs incurred by the kids, estimated at about $400 each. The state of Georgia pays about 40 percent of the cost of the farm safety camp, 33 percent is donated and participants cover 27 percent.

    Following last year's camp, one of kids convinced his father to wear a seat belt on the family's tractor. Later that year his father flipped the tractor and the seat belt saved his life.

    "That one incident justified the existence of the farm safety camp," said O'Connor-Marer. "The state of Georgia put a value of $500,000 in loss of productivity and taxes on loss of one life, and program advocates were able to convince the state Legislature to continue funding the program." However, it's difficult to determine whether the program would have been funded had the incident involving the participant's father not been disclosed. The government will be looking for quantifiable evidence that programs are worth funding.

    "Receiving money from the federal government requires a lot more work on the part of investigators to justify what they are doing, said O'Connor-Marer. "From a taxpayer point of view, that cost-benefit ratio should be of interest to all of us."


  • This page was updated 03 November 2006, 4:15 PM.

    Reproduction of material on this web site is hereby granted solely for personal use. No other use of this material is authorized without prior written approval of UC Regents.

    Copyright © 2008 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.