Western Center for Agricultural Health and Safety 
  Home    The Center    Research    Publications    Community Outreach    Events    Ag Facts    Contact Us

Publications

Journal Articles

AgHealth News
  2008 Summer
  2008 Spring
  2008 Winter
  2007 Fall
  2007 Summer
  2007 Spring
  2007 Winter
  2006 Fall
  2006 Summer
  2006 Spring
  2006 Winter
  2005 Fall
  2005 Summer
  2005 Spring
  2005 Winter
  2004 Fall
  2004 Summer
  2004 Spring
  2004 Winter
  2003 Fall
  2003 Summer
  2003 Spring
  2003 Winter
  2002 Fall
  2002 Summer
  2002 Spring
  2002 Winter
  2001 Fall
  2001 Summer
  2001 Spring
  2001 Winter
  2000 Summer
  2000 Spring
  2000 Winter
  1999 Fall
  1999 Summer
  1999 Spring
  1999 Winter
  1998 Fall
  1998 Summer
  1998 Spring
  1998 Winter
  1997 Fall
  1997 Summer
  1997 Spring
  1997 Winter
  1996 Fall
  1996 Summer
  1996 Spring
  1996 Winter
  1995 Fall
  1995 Summer
  1995 Spring
  1995 Winter
  1994 Fall
  1994 Summer

UC Agricultural Health & Safety Center at Davis

On-Line News

Issue Number 1997-01
Winter 1997

Published by the UC Agricultural Health & Safety Center at Davis, University of California, Davis, Marc Schenker, M.D., M.P.H., Director, Jeff March, Editor


1997-01-01 TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
1997-01-01 Table of Contents
1997-01-02 Welcome and Introduction
1997-01-03 Diver Safety Project Aims to Reduce Number of Child Deaths
1997-01-04 WPS Unknown to Farmworkers
1997-01-05 TB Among Farmworkers
1997-01-06 Share Knowledge on the Aghealth List Server
1997-01-07 Practicing Safety: A Progress Report of Safety Practices
1997-01-08 Voices of Farmers: Effects of Regulation


1996-04-02 WELCOME AND INTRODUCTION
Welcome to the UC Agricultural Health & Safety Center at Davis On-Line News.

On-Line News is a synopsis of news items covered by the Center's quarterly newsletter. The Center has two electronic list servers that allow automatic forwarding of e-mail to a list of subscribers. One server is a forum for announcements and discussion of agricultural health and safety issues and the other is a vehicle for the automatic distribution of the Center's quarterly newsletter.

The e-mail addresses for the forum is: aghealth@epm.ucdavis.edu (message forwarding address) and aghealth-request@epm.ucdavis.edu (subscriber request address). The addresses for the newsletter are: aghealthnews@epm.ucdavis.edu (message forwarding address) and aghealthnews-request@epm.ucdavis.edu (subscriber request address).

To subscribe to a list, send an e-mail message to the request address with no subject and a one line message giving the option subscribe and your name. For example, to subscribe to the forum for announcements and general agricultural health and safety issues, you would send the following: To: aghealth-request@epm.ucdavis.edu Subject: Message: subscribe (your name here)

By return e-mail you will receive confirmation of your request and more information about using the list server request functions.

To subscribe to the On-line News, your request would look like: To: aghealthnews-request@epm.ucdavis.edu Subject: Message: subscribe (your name here)


1997-01-03 DRIVER SAFETY PROJECT AIMS TO REDUCE NUMBER OF CHILD DEATHS
by Cynthia Bates and Martha Stiles
An unrestrained child involved in a 30-mile-an-hour car crash is endangered as much as a child thrown from a 30-story building, according to a California Highway Patrol (CHP) spokesperson,who cites as evidence numerous tragic examples:
  • 1-year-old boy, DOA (dead on arrival), car rear-ended; mother had just lifted him from car seat to feed him
  • 2-year-old girl, DOA; car broadsided by another, child unsecured in the back seat
  • 1-year-old girl, DOA; car struck by a drunk driver, child wearing an adult shoulder-lap belt
  • 1-year-old girl, DOA; father lost control of auto, which overturned, unrestrained child ejected from car, child safety seat found in trunk
  • These incidents were all preventable. Car crashes are the leading cause of death in children. Nationwide some 50,000 injuries are annually inflicted on children riding unrestrained in cars. In Sacramento more than 40 deaths occurred in one year because child safety seats were not used or were not used properly. The ¡Maneje Seguro! driver safety project, based on La Loteria del Manejo Seguro (the Driver Safety Game), was developed by Center investigators to reduce these fatality and injury rates within farmworker families.

    Program staff are working with the CHP, migrant housing centers, the state Office of Traffic Safety and national child injury organizations in developing written and visual child safety seat educational tools. Current California law requires that all children under 4 years or 40 pounds use federally approved child safety seats. Unfortunately, obtaining and installing seats is not the simple answer. According to SafetyBeltSafe, Inc., up to 70 percent of the child safety seats are installed improperly, which, in an accident, can have the same dire impact as having no seat.

    Studies show that the problem lies in poorly written and understood instructions and the lack of uniformity in safety seat and safety belt designs. Engineering may solve the problem in the future, but for now community education efforts will focus on assisting the thousands of safety seat users who may be unaware of the rules of proper installation. No current effort has targeted the farmworker population on the issue of child safety seats, and no barriers exist for farmworker families. Many may not be aware of the law, especially if they migrate from Mexico where laws are different. These families have low literacy levels, little acculturation and virtually no experience with child safety seats. Child safety seats may be perceived as difficult and expensive.

    The collaborative efforts of ¡Maneje Seguro! addresses the importance of proper child safety seat use among the low-literate, Hispanic farmworker population in California. Many people do not realize that proper choice among several types of car seats depends on the age and weight of the child. The highly illustrated bilingual materials describe safe restraint of children and pregnant women, including information on infant seats, convertible seats, booster seats and installation. Color photographs of volunteers from the target audience illustrate each point.

    Patricia Mora, public affairs officer for the CHP, says the bilingual ¡Maneje Seguro! educational material should be disseminated to labor camps, clinics and ESL classes by late summer this year.


    1997-01-04 WPS UNKNOWN TO FARMWORKERS
    by Don Villarejo and Celia Prado, California Institute for Rural Studies
    The Worker Protection Standard (WPS) of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was introduced in 1992 and, after a period of partial implementation, the remaining regulations were promulgated in 1996. Implementation in California began in January 1997 through the California Department of Pesticide Regulation, a branch of Cal-EPA. WPS is the first comprehensive effort by a federal agency to address occupational health and safety risks associated with field worker exposure to agricultural chemicals.

    Prior to WPS, comprehensive farmworker protection regulations regarding pesticide safety had been adopted in only a few states, most notably in California where significant rules have been in place for more than a quarter century. Nevertheless, even in those states, the new regulations mandate additional activities and safeguards designed to protect farmworkers from injury or illness caused by occupational pesticide exposures. WPS requires safety training for all workers who will enter crop fields where certain materials have been applied during the current crop year, as well as explicitly granting certain rights to workers, including a basic "right-to-know."

    A study, funded by the Center, was conducted to determine whether farmworkers in California are aware of the new regulations, whether and how they have received the required training, and whether they believe they are at risk of pesticide illness in their workplace. Nearly 500 interviews were conducted in Spanish by Celia Prado and Luis Magaña in two California counties last summer. A total of 115 interviews were conducted at 17 sites in Yolo County (Sacramento Valley), including two farm labor camps administered by public agencies. An additional 373 interviews were conducted at nearly two dozen sites in San Joaquin County (San Joaquin Valley), including three public farm labor camps.

    Fewer than one in five workers had ever heard of the WPS or of the U.S. EPA. Most of those who claimed to know something about either could not provide anything substantive upon closer questioning. Residents of farm labor camps administered by public agencies were the most likely to have received some training (66 percent), but in most cases it was provided by nonprofit agencies, not their employer. Only a relatively few farmworkers living at private camps had received training. Overall, only about 16 percent of farmworkers said that they had received on-the-job pesticide safety training. Clearly, these results suggest that the news about WPS has not yet reached most farmworkers in California.


    1997-01-05 TB AMONG FARMWORKERS
    by Stephen McCurdy, M.D., M.P.H.
    Tuberculosis (TB) has been a scourge of the human race since antiquity. Even though TB is a preventable and curable disease, worldwide death and suffering from its effects continue in the modern era. The cycle of infection typically begins when an individual ill with tuberculosis coughs up microscopic droplets laden with Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the causative bacterium. When inhaled by uninfected persons, the TB bacterium reproduces in the lungs (primary infection site) and seeds the blood stream.

    Although the majority of infected individuals have competent immune systems and never develop active tuberculosis disease, a minority (5-10 percent over a lifetime) will be unable to hold the infection in check and will develop active tuberculosis disease. Persons at particular risk for developing active tuberculosis disease after initial infection include those with underlying illnesses such as malnutrition, cancer, diabetes, kidney disease and prolonged steroid use. Persons developing active tuberculosis disease usually manifest fever, weight loss, and a productive cough. Caucasians have the lowest rates of TB (4 percent), followed by Hispanics (20-36 percent) and African Americans (29-46 percent). Haitian and Caribbean farmworkers are at greatest risk, ranging from 55 to 83 percent.

    In the summer of 1995, Center investigators, in partnership with representatives from the Yolo County Department of Public Health, conducted several health "ferias" (fairs) at two local migrant housing centers. The purpose of the ferias was to provide tuberculosis screening and treatment services to the resident migrant farmworkers. Participants completed a health questionnaire and tuberculin skin test to determine tuberculosis infection status, and follow-up chest radiography and medication was prescribed as necessary. All services were provided at no cost to participants. Desiree Arretz and Elva Miranda, resident doctors in the UC Davis Department of Internal Medicine and native Spanish speakers, provided important leadership for the project.

    More than 470 individuals participated in the program. Among participants, the overall prevalence for tuberculin skin-test reactivity was approximately 17 percent. The importance of this program was evidenced in a Centers for Disease Control (CDC) survey addressing occupational and residential characteristics of tuberculosis cases from 1985 to 1989. That study indicated that farmworkers accounted for 5 percent of all employed cases.

    A study of 2,206 pulmonary tuberculosis deaths occurring between 1979 and 1990 from the National Occupational Mortality Surveillance data base shows that the chances of farmworkers contracting TB is approximately double that of other employed adults. These studies may underestimate the true risk for farmworkers if foreign-born workers tend to return to their home country when ill, thus escaping detection in the United States. The CDC Advisory Committee on the Elimination of Tuberculosis has recommended that the highest priority be given to detection and diagnosis of persons with symptoms of active TB.

  • Screening and preventive therapy should be made available for agricultural workers and their families.
  • Tuberculosis control activities should utilize outreach workers with the same cultural and linguistic background as thepatient population.
  • Clinical practice among farmworkers should consider the increased risk for tuberculosis in this population.
  • Tuberculin skin tests should be a regular part of general health-care maintenance.
  • Persons with positive skin tests should be further evaluated to determine whether or not they have active tuberculosis disease.
  • Prophylactic treatment should be provided to selected persons with tuberculin reactivity according to accepted clinical criteria. These include recent infection, age younger than 35 years, and the presence of certain underlying conditions.
  • Persons found to have active tuberculosis should be treated according to accepted protocols, and the local health department should be notified so that contact investigation and public-health measures can be initiated.
  • Education of the patient and family is a critical part of any treatment plan. Many patients with positive skin tests are frightened that they are a danger to family members or children. Health care providers must emphasize to their patients that a positive skin test means only that they have been infected at some time in the past, and that they are not infectious as long as they do not develop active tuberculosis. Financial support for this project was provided by the California Wellness Foundation and the Yolo County Department of Public Health.


    1997-01-06 SHARE KNOWLEDGE ON THE AGHEALTH LIST SERVER
    Although the Worldwide Web has taken a leading role on the Internet stage, a fine supporting cast of other communication tools delivers a solid performance. Among those ancillary services are list servers which, though not as glamorous as the web, do a wonderful job of expediting communication between people.

    A list server uses e-mail technology to broadcast topical messages to subscribers, each of whom may participate by posting their own messages. List servers, which typically focus on a particular subject, such as agricultural health and safety, allow participants to collaborate regardless of the distance between them.

    List servers can offer informative, useful often silly and sometimes rather repugnant information. In order to have an active and informative list server, it must be "open" to subscribers and to anyone wishing to share information about the particular topic it was created to address. "Open" (as opposed to "closed") list servers generate a greater variety of information, opinions and character, but are also vulnerable to an occasional sales pitch or offensive message.

    "One of the most interesting e-mail messages I received was from someone requesting information on California law regarding bringing a pet African pygmy hedgehog into California," said Marti Childs, former Center editor and manager of the aghealth list server. "I guess they thought that was in the realm of ag health and safety, but I referred them to the UC California Veterinary Diagnostic Lab."

    Subscribers must understand that the information posted to the list server may not always be of interest to them. That's why giving a good but brief description in the "Subject" line is extremely important when posting messages. Among its many electronic communications, the UC Agricultural Health and Safety Center has a list server called "aghealth." It is open to anyone interested in agricultural health and safety, and we welcome and encourage everyone involved in ag health and safety to participate by posting to it. Some appropriate topics for posting on the aghealth list server include:

  • Questions regarding all aspects of ag health and safety.
  • Research and findings related to ag health and safety.
  • Seminars and other events of interest to ag health and safety professionals worldwide.
  • New programs relating to ag health and safety.
  • URLs (web addresses) for ag health and safety-related home pages.
  • To subscribe to aghealth, send an e-mail message to:
    aghealth-request@epm.ucdavis.edu

    Make sure the "Subject" is blank and, in the body of the message, type the word "subscribe" and your name. An example using the e-mail program Eudora would appear as follows:

    TO: aghealth-request@epm.ucdavis.edu
    FROM: adams@calweb.com
    Subject:
    Cc:
    Bcc:
    Attachments:
    -----------------------------------------------------
    subscribe Mary Adams

    By return e-mail you will receive confirmation of your request and more information about using the list server. To post a message to aghealth, simply send your e-mail message to aghealth@epm.ucdavis.edu. Archives of aghealth postings for the past year can be found on the Center's home page at
    www-epm.ucdavis.edu/agcenter

    To put your news in the spotlight, subscribe to aghealth today.


    1997-01-07 PRACTICING SAFETY: A PROGRESS REPORT OF SAFETY PRACTICES
    In 1995, State Compensation Insurance Fund and the California Farm Bureau Federation presented 680 agricultural enterprises in California with awards for their excellent safety records during the previous year. Award winners represented the top 5 percent of a select group of members of these organizations maintaining good safety records. What was it that these farms, ranches, nurseries and agricultural services did right? What can other agricultural operations learn from their practices?

    Center investigator James Grieshop of the UC Davis Department of Human and Community Development is seeking the answers to these questions by asking awardees about their procedures. In his talk, "Practicing Safety: A Progress Report on a Statewide Study of Safety Practices in California Agriculture" at the Center's noon seminar in January, Grieshop presented some preliminary findings. In October, Grieshop and colleagues, UC Davis graduate students Daniel Carroll and Theresa Lins, and research associate Martha Stiles, sent surveys to the 680 "best practices" award recipients focusing on their enterprises' specific safety practices, as well as on components of their current safety programs. A total of 134 companies responded (about 20 percent)-fewer than Grieshop said he had anticipated.

    "We're using the social marketing paradigm to understand the market with respect to health and safety," said Grieshop. "For example, we're asking about the company's health and safety attitudes, practices, values and belief systems in the areas of health and safety. We're using those and many other factors in designing and testing intervention programs."

    Center investigators determined that roughly 50 percent of respondents have either attended college or have a college degree, and that the average age of survey respondents is 55. Grieshop was pleased by the significant number of responses from medium- to large-size farms. Investigators are also interested in studying the composition of the workforce (e.g., permanent, seasonal and/or contract labor). The highest percentage (90 percent) of the respondents claimed a permanent workforce, roughly two-thirds said they hired seasonal workers, and 33 percent use farm labor contractors.

    "The important thing about these statistics is that they allow us to do some segmenting to conduct more in-depth interviews with some very specific questions targeting the types of workers a company employs and probing how the company organizes its safety programs," said Grieshop. When asked how each company viewed the effectiveness of its safety program, more than 60 percent said their safety program was "very effective," while 39 percent claimed their company's program to be "somewhat effective."

    The researchers are now preparing to use this information to determine the distinctions between practices of these enterprises and those with poorer safety records. They plan to conduct more in-depth surveys of the components of these companies, including their commitment to safety, commitment to workers, and individual safety practices.

    "How are these operations different than other operations?" asked Grieshop. "We want to learn from them and promote these `best practices' to others."


    1997-01-08 VOICES OF FARMERS: EFFECTS OF REGULATIONS
    Farmers' views on ag regulations are recorded in a 150-page publication, "Voices of California Farmers: Effects of Regulations." In telephone interviews conducted during the summer of 1995, 263 farmers shared their opinions and perceptions about regulations in general, as well as how specific regulatory require-ments have affected them and how they have adapted to the various requirements.

    Generally, the growers surveyed asked to be regulated by a system that is less complex, more goal-oriented and incentive- rather than threat-based. They wanted regula-tors to take a "common sense" approach to enforcement

    You can obtain a copy of "Voices of California Farmers" for $15 by calling the Ag Issues Center at (916) 752-2320.


    This page was updated 03 November 2006, 4:15 PM.

    Reproduction of material on this web site is hereby granted solely for personal use. No other use of this material is authorized without prior written approval of UC Regents.

    Copyright © 2008 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.